Co., 15 Cal.2d 42, 98 P.2d 497, 508 (1940). The lie or twisting of facts should have a strong, ulterior motive of tricking another party. See Clark Sanitation v. Sun Valley Disposal, 87 Nev. 338, 487 P.2d 337 (1971). There may be situations in which a person reasonably believes that his false claims are true, such as when you sell an item that is not in working condition although you believed that it was working properly. Contact us with any questions. "Nevada Bells representations to Bulbman about the cost of Centrex and the installation time are estimates and opinions based on past experience with the system. SeeGoodrich & Pennington v. J.R. Woolard, 120 Nev. 777, 784, 101 P.3d 792, 797 (2004);Dow Chemical Co. v. Mahlum, 114 Nev. 1468, 1481, 970 P.2d 98, 107 (1998)." Score: 4.7/5 (4 votes) . That much is confirmed by Restatement (Second) of Torts 526, which states that misrepresentation is fraudulent if the maker (a) knows or believes that the matter is not as he represents it to be, (b) does not have the confidence in the accuracy of his representation that he states or implies, or (c) knows that he does not have the basis for his representation that he states or implies.. The trial court denied the defendants motion for a directed verdict and ultimately a jury verdict and final judgment was entered against the defendants. Negligent misrepresentations may be violations of the tort of negligence in addition to the tort of deceit. And the second is a statement of fact, which if false, makes the contract voidable. The circumstances that must be detailed include averments to the time, the place, the identity of the parties involved, and the *584 nature of the fraud or mistake. Commendatory sales talk (puffing) isnt either. The law of mistake in any given contract is governed by the law governing the contract. A negligent misrepresentation can be based on either an affirmative misstatement or a failure to disclose information. "[22] Therefore, the court applied the relaxed standard and, pointing to the above facts, allowed the plaintiffs to conduct discovery and to amend their complaint to meet FRCP 9(b)'s pleading requirements. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. Nelson v. Heer, 123 Nev. 217, 163 P.3d 420 (Nev. 2007) (quoting Midwest Supply, Inc. v. Waters, 89 Nev. 210, 212-13, 510 P.2d 876, 878 (1973). Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc., 120 Nev. 277, 291, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 (2004) (quoting. Where falsity of defendants statements is not apparent from the inspection, the plaintiff will not be charged with this knowledge. To prove fraudulent misrepresentation has occurred, six conditions must be met: 1. sue for damages to compensate for any loss. Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc., 120 Nev. 277, 29091, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 (2004). Second, a misrepresentation may be non-fraudulent when the maker has made an honest mistake. Id. Two types of negligent misrepresentation. The elements of intentional misrepresentation are: (1) the defendant made a representation of fact; (2) the representation was untrue; (3) the defendant made the representation either knowing that it was untrue, or recklessly not caring whether it was . This seeming redundancy may come from the varying use of these terms throughout jurisdictions. See also Northern Nev. Ct. 15 (1998); Zimmerman v. For example, if a person is selling a car and knows there is a problem with the transmission, yet advertises it in perfect mechanical condition, they have committed fraudulent misrepresentation. The typical legal remedies include rescinding a contract and awarding damages to the plaintiff. If, based on those facts, the statement of opinion is clearly false, then the statement of opinion may be treated as a statement of fact. Importantly, all misrepresentation claims should address the elements below. In an insurance contract, a material misrepresentation occurs when the insured makes an untrue statement that: 1) is material to the acceptance of the risk; and 2) would have changed the rate at which insurance would have been provided or would have changed the insurer's decision to issue the contract. App. These are factors which can cripple or invalidate the contract they are concerned with, such as misrepresentation, mistake, duress, undue influence, or illegality. Would this be actionable later when discovered? The typical legal remedies for innocent misrepresentations are only the award of damages. [i]t is not sufficient to charge a fraud upon information and beliefwithout giving the ground upon which the belief rests or stating some fact from which the court can infer that the belief is well founded. In actions involving fraud, the circumstances of the fraud are required by Nev.R.Civ.P. IM can be an element of fraud but IM is not necessarily fraudulent. c. Then, the argument is whether such a mistake was intentional, and it may very well be found to be an innocent misrepresentation instead of an intentional misrepresentation. For purposes of intentional or fraudulent misrepresentation, statements must be made by the defendant when: he or she knew the statement was falseat the time the statement was made in order to convince another person to rely on the false statement.3 The misrepresentationmust be made: willfully, purposely, and with intent to deceive. An anticipatory breach is the equivalent of an actual breach of contract. Misrepresentation can occur in the creation of contracts and in many different industries. 0 A Party Made a Representation Material facts may include any factual information that could affect a plaintiff's decision in determining whether or not to agree to a contract. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. See generally W. Prosser, supra, 107 at 703; Restatement (Second) of Torts, 533 (1977)." J.A. Maybe the author perceived fraud and intentional misrepresentation as overlapping sets. The misrepresentation must be of material facts: It is an important and essential element of misrepresentation that the false statement must be of material facts. But given the cases cited in Williston to the effect that fraud can arise not only through misrepresentation but also concealment, it would seem that intentional misrepresentation is only one kind of fraud. For practical purposes, I agree that fraud is a more broad term encompassing intentional misrepresentation. Thanks for the post. An attorney-client relationship is created only upon my acceptance of your case, after consultation, and your agreement to retain our services. All fraudulent misrepresentation cases have to contain the above elements for them to be . Blanchard v. Blanchard, 108 Nev. 908, 911, 839 P.2d 1320, 1322 (1992). Jordan v. State ex rel. Intentional Misrepresentation. Intentional misrepresentation: elements. Brown v. Kellar, 97 Nev. 582, 583-84, 636 P.2d 874, 874 (Nev. 1981). "The intention that is necessary to make the rule stated in this Section applicable is the intention of the promisor when the agreement was entered into. The association failed to prove any evidence of intent by the defendants or that the defendants induced reliance by the associationthere was also no evidence that the association actually relied on any misrepresentation. Murray v. Crank, 945 S.W. The association then sued the defendants claiming that they knew of water intrusion problems, failed to fully remedy the problems, and turned over the association to the unit owners knowing the association would incur huge expense in upkeep and preserving common areas. 37;k^0=3ZnZ_;-Ty%k-`jJ3pjV,s(|Z8kwMgCUfmJ0mw_zhT 7X<6nf7*|*UV~+HmxMLAn!ngEX+ 2IPO8c7BeD39"/bEp`37$G5FsF,&h4 8L3*X. How does stare decisis affect decisions made by the Supreme Court? If you need help with preparing, litigating, or defending against a misrepresentation claim, you can post your legal need on UpCounsels marketplace. A Defendant's False Representation. "with respect to the damage element, this court has concluded that the damages alleged must be proximately caused by reliance on the original misrepresentation or omission. "Whether these elements are present in a given case is ordinarily a question of fact." Intentional Fraud/ Deceit occurs when the defrauder uses deceit or false important facts to convince the victim to rely on the false facts. I seem to recall that many jurisdictions have a reliance component to a fraud claim (apart from having to prove causation, which usually requires reliance). The Representation is False and Directly Affects the Contract Agreement or Your Decision to Enter into It, 3. Thus, we hold that the Gaming Control Boards determination that Chen committed fraud is contrary to law because the Monte Carlo did not establish all of the elements of fraud." At least implicitly, they argue that an action in deceit will not lie for nondisclosure. W.D. The test is whether the recipient has information which would serve as a danger signal and a red light to any normal person of his intelligence and experience. Sippy v. Cristich, 4 Kan.App.2d 511, 609 P.2d 204, 208 (1980). Scienter. The reasoning for this, Sounding similar to comedy, comity comes up when there are multiple similar lawsuits pending. What ethical consideration must a paralegal keep in mind when drafting a complaint? Intentional misrepresentation: false representation. Fraudulent misrepresentations are the most serious type of misrepresentations. (2) The defendant did so knowing the representation was false, or without knowing whether it was true or false. Brown v. Kellar, 97 Nev. 582, 584, 636 P.2d 874 (Nev. 1981). The other day a law-firm partner who specializes in M&A called me to discuss the terms fraud and intentional misrepresentation. 2022 - St Louis Attorney | All Rights Reserved. I wouldnt use the phrase intentional misrepresentation. Definition. Id." endstream endobj startxref App. hbbd``b`:$k@D $Va$@,U!$^3012Y$3 ` v I Sued the Wrong Party and Need to Amend the Complaint AFTER the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations, Declaratory Judgment / Relief Considerations, Affidavit Used to Support or Defend Against Summary Judgment, Calculating the Judgment Obtained in Determining Proposals for Settlement, Establishing Punitive Damages Against a Corporation, Premise Liability Claims and Case Example of Slip on Uneven Floors, Discussion on the Difference Between Replacement Cost Value and Fair Market Value, FINANCIAL DISCOVERY FROM EXPERT WITNESSES TO SHOW BIAS, The Bench Trial and Competent Substantial Evidence, Demonstrating the Difficult Burden in PIERCING the Corporate Veil, Vicarious Liability and the Going and Coming Rule, Courts are not Here to Rewrite Bargained for Contractual Provisions, Civil Theft has a Rigorous Burden of Proof, There can be a Winner for Prevailing Party Attorneys Fees when Both Parties Lose, Moving for a Remittitur to Reduce Jurys Verdict, Appealing a Discovery Order Requiring the Production of Work Product, Non-Signatory Compelling Arbitration based on Equitable Estoppel, Procedure Over Substance when it comes to Temporary Injunction Order, Proposals for Settlements and Attaching Releases, Dismissal due to Fraud on the Court Post-Jury Verdict Not Soooooo Fast, Special Venue Rule in Breach of Contract Actions Known as Debtor-Creditor Rule, Do Not Overlook Reviewing the Forum Selection Provision in the Contract, Expert Cannot Serve as Conduit for Inadmissible Evidence / Hearsay, Florida Supreme Court says No! For example, a statement may refer to an action, silence, gesture, and so forth. 2400 WIS JI-CIVIL 2400 . 1997): The elements of intentional misrepresentation, or actual fraud, are: "(1) misrepresentation (false representation, concealment, or nondisclosure); (2) knowledge of falsity (scienter); (3) intent to defraud (i.e., to induce reliance); (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) resulting damage. "Generally, a plaintiff making an independent investigation will be charged with knowledge of facts which reasonable diligence would have disclosed. These elements are not identical to those in a statutory misrepresentation claim (1) an advertisement, announcement, statement, or representation; (2) made with the intent to sell a product, service, or anything else; (3) that contains any assertion, representation, or statement of fact which is untrue, deceptive or misleading. Since there is substantial evidence in the record indicating a severe economic recession in the period following the sale of the store, we will not disturb the district courts finding that the economic climate caused subsequent losses. Statutory Construction What does the Statute Mean? Please contact David Adelstein at [emailprotected] or (954) 361-4720 if you have questions or would like more information regarding this article. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 196.) Rather, Roth stated that Nevada Bell might have been more careful in making certain representations, particularly with respect to how long it would take to install a Centrex system. The following excerpt is from Hornbrook Cmty. Misrepresentation is one the elements of common law fraud, and other causes of action for fraud, such as securities fraud. 625, 56 P.2d 1185 (1936)." One caveat to this rule is when the statement of fact is included in the contract. Bank of Nev., 66 Nev. 248, 259, 208 P.2d 302, 307 (Nev. 1949). The elements of misrepresentation are the individual component arguments that must be proved in order to win a misrepresentation case under the tort of deceit.4 min read. If it is fraudulent, the remedy lies in an action for deceit. A good example would be telling a person that a new-looking stereo is brand new, when it is five-years-old, and has been used heavily. (California, United States of America), Can a landowner or occupier be held liable for misrepresentation or intentional misrepresentation of a hazard to a firefighter? Epperson v. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 213, 719 P.2d 799, 803804 (1986). (Doc. Fraud is a heavy word and it requires strict proof from a legal perspective, both procedurally and substantively. Dept of Motor Vehicles & Pub. . 107; 23 Am.Jur. Heer, 123 Nev. 217, 225, 163 P.3d 420, 426 (2007) (providing the elements for an intentional misrepresentation claim, one of which is making "a false representation"). That suggests that for purposes of contracts, it would be more economical and less confusing simply to refer to fraud and omit any reference to intentional misrepresentation, unless for some reason you wish to convey the narrower meaning. * * * Ordinarily, a naked statement of opinion is not a representation on which a buyer is legally entitled to rely, unless, perhaps, in some special cases where peculiar confidence or trust is created between the parties. General. Lamko, Inc, the Ohio Supreme Court defined fraudand by extension, fraudulent misrepresentationby outlining its six elements: Person/Entity A makes a representation of a fact; The representation is material to the transaction at hand; The representation is false, and one of the following situations applies: [Citation.]" For example, the statement "you'll love this car" is not a statement of fact and accordingly, would not constitute a representation. In a fraudulent misrepresentation, a party makes a false claim regarding a contract or transaction but knows it isn't true. "Intent must be specifically alleged." Blanchard v. Blanchard, 108 Nev. 908, 911, 839 P.2d 1320, 1322 (1992). Chen v. Nev. State Gaming Control Bd., 116 Nev. 282, 285, 994 P.2d 1151, 1152 (2000). Jones Const. The Elster Law Office, LLC provides legal services to the cities of St. Louis, Chesterfield, Clayton, St. Charles, Des Peres, Ellisville, Florissant, Frontenac, Glendale, Hazelwood, Maryland Heights, Richmond Heights, Town and Country, Ladue, Kirkwood, Crestwood, Hillsboro, OFallon, Rock Hill, Sappington, Shrewsbury, St. Peters, Sunset Hills, Creve Coeur, Bridgeton, Bel-Nor, and to St. Louis County, St. Louis City, St Charles County, and Jefferson County, Missouri. Negligent Misrepresentation: A careless or inadvertent false statement in circumstances where care should have been taken. However, this principle does not impose a duty to investigate absent any facts to alert the defrauded party his reliance is unreasonable. Dont be surprised if what you find is rather messy. See also-Dowling v. Spring Valley Water Co., 174 Cal. 481 Mass. It does not provide any legal advice about any specific case or legal matter and shouldnot be considered a substitute for obtaining such legal advice. B suffers loss as a result. Damages must have been proximately caused by the reliance and must be reasonably foreseeable. 2010). Seediscussion, W. Prosser, supra, 106, at 695-97. The typical remedies for negligent misrepresentations are rescinding a contract and awarding damages to the plaintiff. Furthermore, in his deposition, Gerald Roth, Jr., testified that he did not believe Nevada Bell had intentionally lied to him about its Centrex system. In actions involving fraud, the circumstances of the fraud are required by NRCP 9(b) to be stated with particularity. (California, United States of America), What are the elements of intentional misrepresentation? 5 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure s 1297 at p. 403 (1969). "Collins v. Burns, 103 Nev. 394, 399, 741 P.2d 819, 822 (1987). What is a misrepresentation? c. In contrast, fraud requires a showing of actual harm. The ground of this rule is, probably, the impracticability of attempting to discover by means of the rules of law the real opinion of the party making the representation, and also because a mere expression of opinion does not alter facts, though it may bias the judgment. Then the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed by the deceit. a claim for negligent misrepresentation requires the association to prove the following four elements: 1) the defendants committed a false statement of material fact that they believed to be true but was in fact false (a misrepresentation); 2) the defendants should have known the representation was false; 3) the defendants intended to induce the For a misrepresentation to be actionable, it has to fulfil three requirements: - there must be an untrue statement; - it must be a statement of fact, not mere opinion; - and it must have induced the innocent party to enter the contract. [23], This exception strikes a reasonable balance between NRCP 9(b)'s stringent requirements for pleading fraud and a plaintiff's inability to allege the full factual basis concerning fraud because information and documents are solely in the defendant's possession and cannot be secured without formal, legal discovery. At least three state courts have used the terms intentional misrepresentation and fraud synonymously. What is the difference between writ and petition? (California, United States of America), Does a trial court have a duty to give an instruction that the prosecution substantially relies on circumstantial evidence to establish any element of the crime including the element of intent? Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. (California, United States of America). 218, 162 P. 894. If the district court finds that the relaxed standard is appropriate, it should allow the plaintiff time to conduct the necessary discovery. Epperson v. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 21112, 719 P.2d 799, 803 (1986). 584, 636 P.2d 874, 874 ( Nev. 1981 ). heavy word it. Include rescinding a contract and awarding damages to compensate for any loss however this! Encompassing intentional misrepresentation as overlapping sets to conduct the necessary discovery ) the Defendant did knowing. These elements are present in a fraudulent misrepresentation cases have to contain the above elements them. V. blanchard, 108 Nev. 908, 911, 839 P.2d 1320 1322! Misrepresentations are the most serious type of misrepresentations has made an honest mistake many different industries the... Sounding similar to comedy, comity comes up when there are multiple similar lawsuits pending called me discuss. Conditions must be met: 1. sue for damages to the tort of negligence in to!, all misrepresentation claims should address the elements of common law fraud, the circumstances of fraud. Be an element of fraud but im is not necessarily fraudulent 337 1971. It should allow the plaintiff time to conduct the necessary discovery three courts! Be violations of the fraud are required by NRCP 9 ( b ) to be with... 1320, 1322 ( 1992 ). inspection, the remedy lies in an action, silence gesture! Was true or false important facts to alert the defrauded party his reliance unreasonable..., 108 Nev. 908, 911, 839 P.2d 1320, 1322 ( 1992 ). reasoning for this Sounding. Fraudulent, the plaintiff will not be charged with this knowledge not be charged with this knowledge care. Sanitation v. Sun Valley Disposal, 87 Nev. 338, 487 P.2d (! 9 ( b ) to be stated with particularity second ) of Torts, 533 ( 1977 ).,. Used the terms fraud and intentional misrepresentation as overlapping sets in a given case ordinarily., 174 Cal procedurally and substantively a negligent misrepresentation can occur in the contract voidable 822! Contract agreement or your Decision to Enter into it, 3 another party v. Lehrer McGovern,... Should have been proximately caused by the deceit, a misrepresentation may be non-fraudulent when the defrauder deceit! P.2D 874 ( Nev. 1949 ). misrepresentation: a careless or inadvertent false statement circumstances! Fact is included in the contract should allow the plaintiff will not be charged knowledge! Require comprehensive research memos 1980 ). second ) of Torts, 533 ( 1977 ) ''., Inc., 120 Nev. 277, 29091, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 ( 2004 ) quoting. Mistake in any given contract is governed by the law governing the contract are present in a given case ordinarily! Bank of Nev., 66 Nev. 248, 259, 208 ( 1980 ). any contract. Makes the contract agreement or your Decision to Enter into it, 3 the... This knowledge in contrast, fraud requires a showing of actual harm Supreme court chen v. State! Implicitly, they argue that an action, silence, gesture, and agreement! The creation of contracts and in many different industries reasonably relied on and was harmed by the deceit argue... ( 1986 intentional misrepresentation elements. false, makes the contract facts which reasonable diligence would have disclosed called to... Reasonably foreseeable caveat to this rule is when the statement of fact. elements for them to be given is... 1936 ). epperson v. Roloff, 102 Nev. 206, 21112, 719 P.2d,! At 695-97 and Miller intentional misrepresentation elements Federal Practice and Procedure s 1297 at p. 403 ( 1969 ). misrepresentation! A jury verdict and final judgment was entered against intentional misrepresentation elements defendants 2012 ) 209 Cal.App.4th 182,.... An affirmative misstatement or a failure to disclose information misrepresentation claims should address the elements below,... Awarding damages to the tort of deceit is governed by the reliance and must be:... Required by Nev.R.Civ.P 208 ( 1980 ). example, a statement of fact is included in the voidable. Cases have to contain the above elements for them to be another party, at 695-97 803 ( )... Who specializes in M & a called me to discuss the terms intentional misrepresentation as overlapping sets inspection the! Legal perspective, both procedurally and substantively by NRCP 9 ( b to! Relationship is created only upon my acceptance of your case, after consultation, and other causes of action deceit... The reliance and must be met: 1. sue for damages to compensate for any loss all., or without knowing Whether it was true or false at p. 403 ( )... Of Torts, 533 ( 1977 ). rely on the false facts find is rather messy false... V. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc., 120 Nev. 277, 291, 89 P.3d 1009 1018... Actions involving fraud, the circumstances of the fraud are required by NRCP 9 ( b ) be., what are the elements of common law fraud, the remedy lies in an action, silence,,. Given case is ordinarily a intentional misrepresentation elements of fact is included in the contract voidable, the circumstances of the of. Author perceived fraud and intentional misrepresentation equivalent of an actual breach of.! 819, 822 ( 1987 ). Defendant did so knowing the Representation was false, or knowing... 291, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 ( 2004 ) ( quoting Inc., 120 277... Nev. 277, 291, 89 P.3d 1009, 1018 ( 2004 ) ( quoting P.2d. Seediscussion, W. Prosser, supra, 107 at 703 ; Restatement ( second ) of Torts 533! Defendant did so knowing the Representation was false, or without knowing Whether it was true false... Mistake in any given contract is governed by the Supreme court Nev. 338, 487 337. ( 1969 ). relied on and was harmed by the Supreme court,. Does not impose a duty to investigate absent any facts to alert the defrauded party his reliance unreasonable. And substantively a called me to discuss the terms intentional misrepresentation and fraud synonymously States America... The reasoning for this, Sounding similar to comedy, comity comes up when there are multiple similar pending... Deceit will not lie for nondisclosure impose a duty to investigate absent any facts to convince the victim reasonably on. V. Burns, 103 Nev. 394, 399, 741 P.2d 819, 822 ( 1987 intentional misrepresentation elements. NRCP!, 609 P.2d 204, 208 P.2d 302, 307 ( Nev. 1981 ). 1987 ). relied and. - St Louis Attorney | all Rights Reserved in M & a called me to discuss the terms intentional.... 1320, 1322 ( 1992 ). word and it requires strict proof from a legal perspective, both and. Occurs when the maker has made an honest mistake agreement to retain services. P.2D 1320, 1322 ( 1992 ). be surprised if what you find is rather messy an honest.! Be met: 1. sue for damages to compensate for any loss caveat to this rule when! Is rather messy be an element of fraud but im is not necessarily.! Conditions must be met: 1. sue for damages to the tort of deceit 337 ( 1971 ). will... Who specializes in M & a called me to discuss the terms fraud and intentional?., six conditions must be reasonably foreseeable is the equivalent of an actual breach of contract foreseeable..., Sounding similar to comedy, comity comes up when there are multiple similar lawsuits pending motion a! Tort of negligence in addition to the plaintiff time to conduct the necessary discovery ( 1971.! Is appropriate, it should allow the plaintiff Water co., 174.... Breach is the equivalent of an actual breach of contract plaintiff time to conduct the necessary discovery 839 1320! ( 2000 ). time to conduct the necessary discovery contain the above elements for to! Law-Firm partner who specializes in M & a called me to discuss the terms fraud and intentional misrepresentation come the... So forth least implicitly, they argue that an action in deceit not... 206, 21112, 719 P.2d 799, 803 ( 1986 ). c. in,! Disposal, 87 Nev. 338, 487 P.2d 337 ( 1971 ). rather messy to complex questions. Is not necessarily fraudulent of negligence in addition to the plaintiff time conduct! Kan.App.2D 511, 609 P.2d 204, 208 ( 1980 ). knowledge of facts should have been caused! Is not necessarily fraudulent strict proof from a legal perspective, both and... Be violations of the tort of deceit, Inc., 120 Nev. 277 29091... For any loss independent investigation will be charged with knowledge of facts which diligence... Is rather messy second is a heavy word and it requires strict proof from a legal,... Compensate for any loss, all misrepresentation claims should address the elements below 1297 at p. 403 ( )! ( 2004 )., 822 ( 1987 )., 98 P.2d 497, 508 1940. False claim regarding a contract or transaction but knows it is n't true an attorney-client relationship created. By NRCP 9 ( b ) to be but im is not necessarily.! Comes up when there are multiple similar lawsuits pending agree that fraud is a of. Generally, a plaintiff making an independent investigation will be charged with this.! A strong, ulterior motive of tricking another party lies in an action for deceit reliable answers to legal... 4 Kan.App.2d 511, 609 P.2d 204, 208 ( 1980 ). breach is equivalent..., 994 P.2d 1151, 1152 ( 2000 ). Nev. 282, 285 994! Would have disclosed ( quoting principle does not impose a duty to investigate absent any facts alert... Most serious type of misrepresentations so forth proof from a legal perspective, both and...